Why Ripperlogy should make you uncomfortable

We are fascinated by the dead, female body. In every Jack the Ripper walk the victims are murdered for our entertainment.  They are repeatedly reduced to their dead form so that we may experience a thrill of horror.

For many, being an expert in the Whitechapel Murders, or a Ripperologist, means having a detailed knowledge of the injuries sustained by the victims. It means being able to debate how much medical training the wounds imply, what type of knife was used,  whether the killer was left or right handed. This is thoroughly perverse (and it becomes even more disturbing when you take into consideration that the majority of Ripperlogists are men). Most of us wouldn’t be comfortable discussing these topics if they related to a contemporary murder case. Yet because these women were killed 130 years ago, the distance of time seems to have made the women less real and less deserving of our respect.

Ripperlogy (a term which in itself is hugely problematic) so often takes away the women’s humanity. They are rendered an anatomical subject onto which Jack the Ripper mapped clues about his identity and motives. As this level of scrutiny is today used by forensic scientists and pathologists, you might argue that Ripperologists are pursuing a legitimate investigative process. However, this is an argument which only holds when there is a chance of achieving justice for the victim. We will never know who Jack the Ripper is. It is impossible to think that anyone could uncover enough conclusive evidence to solve this cold case.

Despite the fools-errand that trying to solve the Whitechapel murders is, plenty of people have attempted to expose the perpetrator’s identity whilst few have sought to understand who the victims were. To address this we need to re-insert the women fully and comprehensively back into the(ir) narrative. Their lives offer a starting point for explaining both the female experience of Victorian London and the socio-economic characteristics of the East End. By analysing how Londoners responded to the deaths, we can also reveal attitudes towards working class women. There is much to be learned from the Whitechapel murders, and the identity of the killer is, frankly, the least interesting.

This is far from being a new argument. It is pretty well established in the academic historiography of 1888. Within popular culture though, it’s a view yet to gain much traction. Several years ago a new Jack the Ripper museum in the East End promised to place the women at the centre of its exhibition. And indeed it did; in the bloody form of mutilated corpses. Just this week the London Dungeon have come under fire for a publicity poster that invites visitors to ‘laugh’ their way through a Jack the Ripper experience.

London Dungeon poster picture
Copyright Nigel Howard

Jack the Ripper does not deserve the attention he has been given. I have no doubt that the level of notoriety he has gained would have pleased him greatly. It’s not enough for a Ripperlogist to acknowledge that the killer is a brutal sociopath if this is then followed by ten chapters examining his methods and psyche. We must condemn Jack the Ripper by silencing the speculation around his identify. This would have the added benefit of preventing Ripperologists dragging the names of innocent Victorian men through the mud.

So the next time you find yourself reaching for the latest tome purporting to finally reveal Jack the Ripper’s real identity, remember the cost to the victims.


Turner’s Court: The forgotten slum?

Slums are about as Victorian as smog, deer stalker hats and sewers. The popular imagination has firmly situated them within a body of characteristics which define the 19th century city in contemporary culture. Pitiable living conditions, from the cotton worker’s dingy basement dwelling in thriving Manchester to the multi-purpose single rooms of the sweated labour workforce in Spitalfields, signify this was a period when despite the best efforts of individual philanthropists the extreme poor were left to seek out an existence in rotting, filthy, overcrowded lodgings. The trouble was the Victorian’s obsession with distinguishing between the deserving and undeserving poor often put the residents of the very worst housing in a category labelled ‘beyond help’. The criminal classes, which frequently had the run of these streets, assisted exponentially in condemning the locals to the undeserving pile. These are the regions which were coloured black in social investigator Charles Booth’s poverty maps and were inhabited by people who, according to Booth, lived ‘the life of savages, with vicissitudes of extreme hardship’ and whose ‘only luxury is drink’.

So far this is a familiar story. London’s semi-criminal districts are famous, particularly Covent Garden’s Seven Dials, the St. Giles slum south of Tottenham Court Road and Whitechapel’s Flower and Dean Street (which has a central role in the history of the Ripper murders). There is however one metropolitan locality which was notorious in the late 19th century which rarely gets a mention: Turner’s Court. Turner’s Court, populated with thieves, market porters, street sellers and ‘draggled’ women, is important because of its location. Situated minutes from the capital’s grandest statement of imperial and cultural success, Turner’s Court was the neighbour of Trafalgar Square and the National Gallery. By the 1890s, when it was surveyed by Booth, it was an anachronistic throw back to the days when Charing Cross was awash with pockets of slum housing, the majority of which were swept away in the 1830s when space was carved out for the new square. At the end of the century little more shielded it from view than the shop fronts of St. Martin’s Lane.

Given the extent of metropolitan improvements in the vicinity, especially the creation of Charing Cross Road and Shaftsbury Avenue which entailed the demolition of St. Giles, it’s hard to pinpoint why Turner’s Court was left to fester. In all likelihood the nearby destruction of central London’s low class housing even drove the population of Turner’s Court upwards. Perhaps because it was tucked away (out of sight, out of mind) or because it wasn’t as extensive as other slums its clearance was not a priority. Maybe circumstances ensured its continued existence. The fact that no new road was destined to plough straight through it might have been what saved Turner’s Court from the bulldozers. Whatever the reason one thing is sure – the police had a nightmare imposing their authority on it.

Speaking to one of Booth’s researchers in 1898 Constable Albert Gunn recalls the violence faced by himself and his colleagues if they dared to enter the alleys of Turner’s Court. Having had cause to investigate the ‘smelly, airless place’ just three months earlier, one of Gunn’s team had had his bravery rewarded by a resident who slashed his throat. Turner’s Court was also a well known retreat for fingersmiths and muggers who, after snatching watches in St. Martin’s Lane, would withdraw to its streets for cover. Given the treatment meted out to police officers who followed them this must have been a successful tactic.

Turner’s Court is significant because it shows just how diverse the social and residential make-up of central London continued to be at the turn of the 20th century. For the most part of the 19th century London had been busy zoning itself off – the rich to the west, the middle class to the suburbs of north and south London, and the poor largely confined to the east (to brazenly generalise). Central London had spent much of this time ridding itself of its residents. Evictions were imposed to make way for new streets and railway lines whilst the clamour to escape its dirt and bustle and realise the suburban dream had hastened depopulation. Yet Charing Cross, despite a fall in permanent inhabitants, remained the home of everyone from ‘the Queen to the crossing sweeper’. It was truly a place where every member of the Victorian social strata could go about their business, where politicians could endorse the Empire, where tourists could luxuriate in the comforts of its modern hotels, where the culturally curious could visit the finest paintings in the country, and where thieves could find unguarded pockets and a place to hide.


Find out more about the Whitechapel Murders

There are a plethora of books and websites available on the Whitechapel Murders, ranging from the ridiculous and worrying to the scholarly and insightful. Here are a handful that I have found to be well-researched and informative.

Philip Sugden, The Complete History of Jack the Ripper

Sugden’s book balances detailed historical research with gripping story telling. It provides a thorough account of the events surrounding the Whitechapel Murders and critically analyses some of the most popular theories regarding Jack the Ripper’s identity. This book is a good starting point for anyone new to the subject.

Alex Werner, Jack the Ripper and the East End

This compilation of scholarly and inter-displinary articles is one of the best attempts I have encountered of embedding the Whitechapel Murders within their historical context. The book was published in conjunction with an exhibition on the murders at the Museum of London, and consequently features work by well-established academics. The range of topics includes the immigrant experience of the East End, female heroism, and housing conditions. It is wonderfully illustrated and the richness of the pictures bring the Victorian East End to life.

Drew Gray, London’s Shadows: The dark side of the Victorian city

Grey’s book uses the Whitechapel Murders as a starting point from which to investigate a much wider range of social, economic, and cultural themes. In doing so he writes on several crucial topics that are essential for anyone who wants to understand the context in which these murders took place; newspapers coverage and sensationalism, social investigation and housing reform, and the divisions between ‘East’ and ‘West’ London.

Casebook is a comprehensive repository for all things related to the Whitechapel Murders. I find it a useful reference tool as it has information on every person and every event that is related to the killings. The website is geared towards the uncovering of Jack the Ripper’s identity though and some of the content ought to be treaten with caution, particularly the research articles.